[Slackbuilds-users] naming conventions

[Andrzej Telszewski]

On 08/03/2025 20:31, fsLeg wrote:
> This question was actually raised a few days ago in a thread about a 
> proposed SlackBuild template for packaging pre-built binaries. It also 
> proposed to name scripts for repackaging software as *-bin, and in the 
> following discussion I felt that the consensus was to use exactly that 
> naming scheme for SlackBuilds, except for cases when repackaging a 
> binary is the only SBo-compatible way (like proprietary software).

I love this idea!

>
> So you should ask the current maintainer of kubectl to rename the 
> SlackBuild to kubectl-bin or even remove it altogether if building 
> from source doesn't require many dependencies and not resource-intensive.

Exactly. :-)