[Slackbuilds-users] requirements in README files

[markus reichelt]

* J <j at dawnrazor.net> wrote:

> I'm wondering if there's any hope at all of perhaps enforcing
> slackbuilds to have a consistent format in their README files for
> listing requirements.

So far, the status quo of README files has worked for me. One is
supposed to read them anyway, remember?

Maybe sbopkg is more tuned to your frequency.

-- 
left blank, right bald
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20120709/39823288/attachment-0001.asc>