[Slackbuilds-users] requirements in README files

markus reichelt ml at mareichelt.com
Mon Jul 9 17:24:47 UTC 2012

* J <j at dawnrazor.net> wrote:

> I'm wondering if there's any hope at all of perhaps enforcing
> slackbuilds to have a consistent format in their README files for
> listing requirements.

So far, the status quo of README files has worked for me. One is
supposed to read them anyway, remember?

Maybe sbopkg is more tuned to your frequency.

left blank, right bald
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20120709/39823288/attachment-0001.asc>

More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list