[Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20070822
me at alkos333.net
Thu Sep 27 19:01:41 UTC 2007
I don't know like this package - it doesn't comply with Slackware packaging,
so I would go with option 1.
On 9/27/07, Alan Hicks <alan at lizella.net> wrote:
> Robby Workman wrote:
> >> I am very much against this binary patching. Symlinking would be much
> >> cleaner.
> > That being the case, would it be better to do one of these:
> > 1. Remove the qemu binary repackage script from our repo, since it
> > can't be made to work properly *and* keep everything out of the
> > /usr/local hierarchy, OR
> > 2. Leave the qemu binary distributed in /usr/local as it's packaged
> > originally and add/rearrange only as needed for the docs and such
> > to be compliant with Slackware packaging
> > 3. Leave it as is and hope for the best
> 4. Leave it as is and make note of the problem with both solutions in
> the README for the user to consider. Never, ever, out think the user.
> When the solution is this easy, and it's noted clear in the README file,
> than a user has no right to complain or think a "package" as it were is
> broken. Period.
> It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
> Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
> Ecclesiastes 7:5
> Slackbuilds-users mailing list
> Slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Slackbuilds-users