[Slackbuilds-users] .info Feature Requests

King Beowulf kingbeowulf at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 19:21:25 UTC 2012

On 11/14/2012 10:04 PM, Chris Abela wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Robby Workman <rworkman at slackbuilds.org> wrote:
> :
>> Off is the general direction in which you can fuck.
>> ---snip---
>> That is all.
> While I think that we could have done without the decorative nature of
> the language contained in the mail above, I also would not like to see
> the info file burdened with information of dubious importance.
> Consider the originally requested LICENSE field. How shall we decide
> what abides to what and under which definition and by which authority.
> Writing SlackBuilds is fun because it is not very different from what
> you would have wanted to to write for your own local system. Therefore
> the process provides an efficient method on how users may contribute
> to the "Slackware Experience" without having to go too much out of
> their way. Let's keep it this way; fun.
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
I can understand the crankiness (my bathroom remodel is taking ages) 
even though I don't quite agree with it: this list is after all for a 
discussion of SBo topics. If the admins don't agree  with a request a 
simple "NO" will suffice.

That said, I see no reason to add licensing complexity to SBo.  Lets 
keep it simple and fun.


More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list