[Slackbuilds-users] [RFC] a binary repack SlackBuild template.

[Noel Butler]

On 13/03/2025 21:43, fsLeg wrote:

> What you're talking about is $PRGNAM-$VERSION-$ARCH-$BUILD$TAG.$PKGTYPE 
> format in its entirety. The topic, however, is whether $PGRNAM should 
> be prgnam or prgnam-bin for scripts that just repackage pre-built 
> binaries.

My bad, I guess I didn't read the entire thread, (I use by-date and not 
threads in my mail and most list groups are auto marked as read by sieve 
- yes, my choice), however, my opinion is same.

We didnt call postfix postfix-bin and so on, built or pre built, who 
cares, so no, just use the standard naming convention for the binary, 
ie: postfix, or  yourbinary...

I use binary packs from proprietary companies for billing system, 4G5G 
service management, and so on, they dont call their binaries foo-bin or 
foo.bin even, they use the standard naming convention, ie "foo". I dont 
see any problem that needs solving here.

-- 
Regards,
Noel Butler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20250322/1395e064/attachment.htm>